Explore web search results related to this domain and discover relevant information.
I am neither a copyright lawyer nor a judge. I’m sure both have detailed and technical answers such as there are different legal frameworks around fair use and they apply differently to AI training versus direct reproduction. But suspend, if you will, all those technicalities for a moment.
Is it simply that Eight Mile Style, Eminem’s publishing company, could crush me for quoting Eminem in a book because I am small in comparison, or that Meta could drown Eight Mile Style, which is equally small in comparison, in teams of lawyers and years of delay? (I should note that Eight Mile Style has filed its own copyright infringement lawsuit against Meta, in which it alleges “another case of a trillion (with a ‘T’) dollar company exploiting the creative efforts of musical artists for the obscene monetary benefit of its executives and shareholders without a licence and without regard to the rights of the owners of the intellectual property”. Hear, hear.I’m writing a book and can’t quote a single line from a song. So how can big tech legally feast on all the lyrics ever written? asks Guardian Europe columnist Alexander HurstCue that line from the National as a perfect stage-setting epigraph – though only in theory. Song lyrics, my publisher informs me, are subject to notoriously strict copyright enforcement and the cost to buy the rights is often astronomical.I imagine that a copyright expert would tell me that what ChatGPT did is akin to me scribbling lines from the National or Eminem in a personal notebook; that if I ever recorded and sold this AI-generated song quoting either one directly, then I would be guilty of infringing on protected material.
Again, I'm not any kind of lawyer, and I'm definitely not offering legal advice, but yeah, I'm not buying this argument. I'd argue that a truly transformative, creative synthesis requires at least some understanding of whatever material you're imbibing.
The UK's Data (Use and Access) Bill has now passed, without the amendment that would've required AI tools to declare the use of copyrighted material, or any provision for copyright holders to 'opt-out' of their work being used as training data. The whole thing has left me wondering if there'll ever be something that AI can't gobble up and regurgitate.A federal judge has ruled that Anthropic didn't break the law when it used copyrighted material to train the large language model Claude, as this counts as "fair use" under US copyright law, reports AP News. What's keeping Anthropic submerged in legal hot water, though, is how the company may have acquired that copyrighted material—in this case, thousands of books not bought but 'found' online.The full complaint goes on to read, "An essential component of Anthropic’s business model—and its flagship 'Claude' family of large language models (or 'LLMs')—is the largescale theft of copyrighted works," and that the company “seeks to profit from strip-mining the human expression and ingenuity behind each one of those works.”As such, the ruling made by San Francisco federal court Judge William Alsup on Monday means that Claude can keep being trained on the author's works—but Anthropic must return to court in December to be tried based on the whole "largescale theft of copyrighted works" thing.
Blake Brittain reports on intellectual ... copyrights and trade secrets, for Reuters Legal. He has previously written for Bloomberg Law and Thomson Reuters Practical Law and practiced as an attorney. LitigationcategoryUS Supreme Court dealt blows to EPA and environmental protections ... GovernmentcategoryTrump lawyer says no immediate ...
Blake Brittain reports on intellectual property law, including patents, trademarks, copyrights and trade secrets, for Reuters Legal. He has previously written for Bloomberg Law and Thomson Reuters Practical Law and practiced as an attorney. LitigationcategoryUS Supreme Court dealt blows to EPA and environmental protections ... GovernmentcategoryTrump lawyer says no immediate deportations under birthright citizenship order, as judges to decide on challengesMay 28 (Reuters) - A federal judge in Washington, D.C., on Wednesday rejected U.S. Copyright Office Director Shira Perlmutter's emergency bid to block the Trump administration from firing her.Perlmutter's firing came one day after the Copyright Office released a report on the intersection of artificial intelligence and copyright law. The office said in the report that technology companies' use of copyrighted works to train AI may not always be protected under U.S.Attorneys for Perlmutter did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the decision. A spokesperson for the Copyright Office declined to comment.
Deacons’ copyright practice has been consistently ranked in tier one by independent directory Managing Intellectual Property since 2008. Our lawyers can help you identify and protect your valuable copyright in Hong Kong and Mainland China and advise on all aspects of copyright subsistence ...
Deacons’ copyright practice has been consistently ranked in tier one by independent directory Managing Intellectual Property since 2008. Our lawyers can help you identify and protect your valuable copyright in Hong Kong and Mainland China and advise on all aspects of copyright subsistence and protection.Deacons’ experienced team of copyright lawyers have kept pace with both the legal developments and the new technologies prompting them.We also provide tailor-made copyright audits for companies to ensure that their copyrights are properly identified and protected, as well as how to implement policies and procedures to avoid infringing third party copyright, which may lead to criminal prosecution.Acted for a world leading provider of optoelectronic solutions against a Chinese electronics conglomerate in complex litigation and arbitration relating to breach of confidence, patent and copyright infringement spanning over four jurisdictions.
Axiom Law’s network of intellectual property lawyers is extensive and diverse, enabling us to match businesses with professionals who have the specific skills and experience required to tackle their unique IP challenges.
Axiom helps you find & engage the right business-oriented Intellectual Property Lawyers and consultants. Axiom lawyers have deep domain experience across a wide array of IP matters including patents, trademarks, trade secrets, copyrights, and portfolio management.Our team of high-caliber intellectual property (IP) attorneys can support you with intellectual property litigation, trademark law, copyright law, patent law, creative works, and more. Whether your in-house legal team requires ongoing support with IP law, or limited assistance with patents, trademarks and copyrights, Axiom can help match your legal needs with an experienced intellectual property lawyer.Axiom Law’s network of intellectual property lawyers is extensive and diverse, enabling us to match businesses with professionals who have the specific skills and experience required to tackle their unique IP challenges.Axiom makes it easy to find intellectual property lawyers. Find the lawyers and legal staff you need with Axiom’s Talent Finder. Browse through our network of legal professionals with deep experience in intellectual property law. You can narrow your search by applying filters for location, availability, and experience.
Looking for a copyright attorney? Then use the Copyright Alliance's complimentary search engine designed for creators to get the help that they need.
There could be many reasons why a creator would want to work with a copyright attorney. For those creators who are interested in hiring an attorney to help them with a particular copyright issue, we have tried to make this search easy by providing the table below.Many of these attorneys advise in multiple areas of intellectual property in addition to copyright law, including trademark law and patent law. The Copyright Alliance does not provide legal advice and does not recommend any specific copyright attorney over another.If you are looking for some guidance on what factors to consider when searching for a copyright attorney, we suggest you read the following blog: Warning: Your Attorney May Be Hazardous to your Copyright Health.Instead, we recommend you work with a copyright attorney if you need legal advice on a copyright issue you have encountered.
Roanie Levy dives into Generative AI, and how it has caused a legal earthquake that has sent shockwaves through the world of copyright.
Unlock the secrets of copyright compliance with our expert insights. Navigate legal landscapes and safeguard your content. Explore our blog now!
Backed by a team of experienced intellectual property lawyers in Hong Kong and China, OLN can provide you with practical legal advice to safeguard your intellectual property rights. Intellectual property right is territorial in nature and is a broad topic that encompasses various types of original creations, such as copyright...
Backed by a team of experienced intellectual property lawyers in Hong Kong and China, OLN can provide you with practical legal advice to safeguard your intellectual property rights. Intellectual property right is territorial in nature and is a broad topic that encompasses various types of original creations, such as copyright, patent and design.The team excels at managing client expectations, delivering practical and commercially viable solutions. They stay up-to-date with the latest developments in IP law and swiftly adjust their approaches accordingly. This resourcefulness demonstrates their dedication to client service. It’s a great experience having Vera as my IP lawyer.With solid knowledge in China and Hong Kong Intellectual Property law, our Intellectual Property team is able to advise on diverse topics related to intellectual property law in Hong Kong and China and assist clients in protecting their trademarks, patents, designs and copyright.Intellectual property (Copyright/Trademark) – Tier 1
Rudderless Copyright Office has taken on new prominence during the AI boom.
Our global intellectual property lawyers have considerable experience in all aspects of copyright law including protection, due diligence, licensing and enforcement.
Our global intellectual property lawyers have considerable experience in all aspects of copyright law, including assessing the scope of protection for different types of works, due diligence, licensing and enforcement. We assist clients in everything from litigating copyright issues and policing copyright portfolios to obtaining copyright registrations.Our lawyers have technical backgrounds and open source licensing experience, which is invaluable for audits, compliance assessments, and developing in-house training programs and procurement processes. · Clients depend on our experience within a wide range of copyrightable works, including software, data and database, machine-generated works, audio recordings and music, art, motion pictures and television, technical and architectural designs, literature, mask works and semiconductor chips and evolving media, including telecommunications and the internet.Our work in copyright law is multi-jurisdictional, with our global team of IP lawyers able to represent our clients’ interests around the world. We are noted as a leading law firm in highly relevant technical copyright areas such as artificial intelligence, non-fungible tokens (NFTs), virtual worlds (e.g.Trademark practices, lawyers recognized in WTR 1000 2023 Global | February 14, 2023
Some lawyers, law school clinics, or organizations may be available to provide legal assistance or representation on a pro bono basis, which means you will not be charged for their services. It also may be possible to engage an attorney at a reduced cost.
You do not need a lawyer or a law student representative to file or respond to a CCB claim, but you may choose to retain or consult one.Referral services: Referral services connect you with a lawyer providing services for free or at a reduced cost.Consultations: Consultations are a one-time meeting between you and a lawyer in which you will discuss your legal matter.The lawyer may provide their recommended course of action and you can decide whether or not to proceed with representation.
In a motion related to Perlmutter's ... up to “challenges in litigation,” something outside copyright experts have also pointed out. “It’s true the law doesn’t explicitly require a signature,” IP lawyer Rachael Dickson says....
In a motion related to Perlmutter's lawsuit, though, she alleges that sending out the registrations without a signature opens them up to “challenges in litigation,” something outside copyright experts have also pointed out. “It’s true the law doesn’t explicitly require a signature,” IP lawyer Rachael Dickson says.“Litigators who are trying to challenge a copyright registration’s validity will jump on this.” · Perlmutter’s lawyers have argued that leaving the Copyright Office without an active boss will cause dysfunction beyond the registration certificate issue, as the Register performs a variety of tasks, from advising Congress on copyright to recertifying organizations like the Mechanical Licensing Collective, the nonprofit in charge of administering royalties for streaming and download music in the United States.During a wild time for copyright law, the US Copyright Office has no one at the helm—and no one knows when that will change.It’s a tumultuous time for copyright in the United States, with dozens of potentially economy-shaking AI copyright lawsuits winding through the courts. It’s also the most turbulent moment in the US Copyright Office’s history. Described as “sleepy” in the past, the Copyright Office has taken on new prominence during the AI boom, issuing key rulings about AI and copyright.
Looking for legal advice on intellectual property? Choose from our list of affordable lawyers in Singapore. SingaporeLegalAdvice.com is the one-stop platform for your legal needs.
A US court has ruled Anthropic was not breaching copyright rules when it trained its AI model on books.
A lawyer for the authors declined to comment.A US judge has ruled that using books to train artificial intelligence (AI) software is not a violation of US copyright law.Anthropic, a firm backed by Amazon and Google's parent company, Alphabet, could face up to $150,000 in damages per copyrighted work.
The judge said that one "potentially winning argument" — that AI tools could harm the market for human-created content — was barely mentioned.
A group of authors had sued Meta, saying their copyrighted books were used to train its AI models. The judge said the plaintiffs' lawyers failed to make the right arguments.Instead, the judge said the lawyers for the other side botched the case. A California federal judge on Wednesday dismissed most of a lawsuit brought by a group of authors who accused Meta of using their copyrighted books to train its AI models."This ruling does not stand for the proposition that Meta's use of copyrighted materials to train its language models is lawful," Chhabria said. "It stands only for the proposition that these plaintiffs made the wrong arguments and failed to develop a record in support of the right one." Chhabria said that one "potentially winning argument" — that AI tools could harm the market for human-created content — was barely mentioned. The lawyers representing the authors presented no evidence about how Meta's models could generate outputs that would "dilute the market" for their works, he said.Judge William Alsup of the Northern District of California ruled that Anthropic's use of millions of copyrighted books to train its AI models was "exceedingly transformative" and qualified as fair use, a legal doctrine that allows certain uses of copyrighted works without the copyright owner's permission.
Primerus member HJM Asia Law & Co LLC is a Copyright Law Firm in Singapore, Singapore.
The proven Singapore copyright lawyers at the HJM Asia Law & Co LLC law firm are experienced in the effective resolution of copyright lawsuits as related to copyright agreements in Singapore. Singapore copyright attorneys are knowledgeable in all areas of general copyright law, including but not limited to copyright infringement claims and copyright protection cases in Singapore.A local Singapore copyright attorney should be consulted for specific requirements in your area. A Singapore copyright lawyer is professional and knowledgeable in understanding the details, facts, complications, and circumstances that arise in a Singapore copyright case.The Singapore copyright attorneys of HJM Asia Law & Co LLC law firm are distinguished by a history of successful copyright claim recoveries. For experienced representation in a copyright dispute or for assistance drafting or reviewing a new contract, please call a Singapore copyright lawyer with the HJM Asia Law & Co LLC law firm in Singapore.Clients will have the confidence of knowing that the case is being handled by an experienced and knowledgeable Singapore copyright lawyer.
April 20, 2021 Media Mentions Flavia Campbell Quoted by LegalZoom on Copyright Protections in Graphic Design · January 15, 2021 In the News Flavia Campbell Named a Top 100 Lawyer in Arizona by Az Business View All Insights
Dickinson Wright's experienced team knows the nuances of copyright law and regularly works on a wide range of copyright-related matters. Learn more.Dickinson Wright’s Copyright team understands the nuances of copyright law and works closely with our clients on a wide range of copyright-related matters. As a full-service law firm with offices strategically located across the U.S.Our experienced team counsels clients regarding clearance, prosecution, registration, licensing, fair use, and enforcement of copyrights, including identifying copyrighted assets when conducting due diligence in mergers, acquisitions, joint ventures, strategic alliances, and asset purchases (including in connection with music catalog sales).Copyright Registration and Protection: We regularly help clients register, protect, and enforce their copyrights for all types of works in the U.S. Copyright Office and the Canadian Copyright Office. We also help clients register copyrights with the U.S. Customs and Border Protection agency to provide additional protection for stopping counterfeit and infringing works at the border.
The 108-page report was a “pre-publication” version, which means it wasn’t yet finalized. It is not customary for the US Copyright Office to release this type of document, according to copyright lawyer Aaron Moss.
“The president has as much legal power to fire the Register of Copyrights as I do, which is to say: none,” Meredith Rose, legal counsel for intellectual property nonprofit Public Knowledge, said in a statement. The document the two men cited also stated that deputy attorney general Todd Blanche, who previously served as a personal defense lawyer for Trump, was now the acting Librarian of Congress.The two men appeared at the US Copyright Office days after the Trump administration fired its leader, who had just published a report about the use of copyrighted materials for AI training.Two men claiming to be newly appointed Trump administration officials tried to enter the US Copyright Office in Washington, DC, on Monday, but left before gaining access to the building, sources tell WIRED. Their appearance comes days after the White House fired the director of the copyright office, Shira Perlmutter, who had held the job since 2020.Perlmutter was removed from her post on Saturday, one day after the agency released a report that raised concerns about the legality in certain cases of using copyrighted materials to train artificial intelligence.
John Strand, a copyright lawyer at the US law firm Wolf Greenfield, said the decision from a “well-respected” judge was “very significant”.
Judge says firm made ‘fair use’ of literature but storage of pirated books in central library constituted infringementAlsup added, however, that Anthropic’s copying and storage of more than 7m pirated books in a central library infringed the authors’ copyrights and was not fair use – although the company later bought “millions” of print books as well.The copyright issue has pitted AI firms against publishers and the creative industries because generative AI models – the term for technology that underpins powerful tools such as the ChatGPT chatbot – have to be trained on a vast amount of publicly available data in order to generate their responses.An Anthropic spokesperson said the company was pleased the court recognised its AI training was transformative and “consistent with copyright’s purpose in enabling creativity and fostering scientific progress”.
AMICA LAW LLC is a leading specialist intellectual property and technology practice in Singapore. Our seasoned lawyers and patent agents bring years of experience, and the depth of expertise required to protect, manage, commercialise and enforce your IP and technology, and to provide you with ...
AMICA LAW LLC is a leading specialist intellectual property and technology practice in Singapore. Our seasoned lawyers and patent agents bring years of experience, and the depth of expertise required to protect, manage, commercialise and enforce your IP and technology, and to provide you with legal support on commercial matters.Our dedicated team of lawyers, patent attorneys, and IP professionals is here to guide you through the complexities of the legal and regulatory landscape in Singapore, ensuring that your creations are well protected, exploited on favourable terms, and effectively enforced.“Amica Law offers solutions and is very flexible in its approach. The lawyers place a lot of emphasis on client service.”
